Paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide versus paclitaxel/topotecan for extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network randomized prospective phase II trial.
نویسندگان
چکیده
7205 Background: Platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy is currently standard for patients (pts) with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Nonplatinum doublets of active newer drugs may be superior. METHODS The purpose of this randomized phase II trial was to compare the toxicity, response rates, and progression-free survival (PFS) of platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy to paclitaxel plus topotecan. Between December 1999 and June 2003, 120 pts with extensive stage small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either Arm A (60 pts): paclitaxel 200mg/m2 day 1, carboplatin AUC 6 day 1, oral etoposide 50mg alternating with 100mg for 10 consecutive days for 4 cycles (repeated every 3 weeks) versus Arm B (60 pts): paclitaxel 175mg/m2 day 1, and topotecan 1.5mg/m2 days 1, 2, and 3, for 4 cycles (repeated every 3 weeks). Eligibility required no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1, and normal organ function. RESULTS Pts were evenly matched with respect to PS, visceral metastases, number of metastatic sites, and gender. There were 68 men and 52 women. Grade 3/4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: Arm A - 20 pts (33%)/6 pts (10%); Arm B - 27 pts (45%)/14 pts (23%). Nonhematologic toxicity was similar in both arms. Overall response rates were 77% (38 pts) in Arm A and 49% (25 pts) in Arm B (p=0.03) with 13% (8 pts) with complete responses in Arm A and 6.5% (4 pts) in Arm B (p=0.12), respectively. The median PFS in Arm A was 7.4 months versus 5.5 months for Arm B (p=0.0043). Progression-free survival at 12 months and 18 months was 15% and 8% in Arm A and 8% and 0% in Arm B, respectively. Median survival in Arm A was 10.6 months versus 9.1 months in Arm B (p=0.2581). The 12-month and 18-month survival was 38% and 20% in Arm A and 30% and 13% in Arm B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The overall toxicity profile, response rate, and PFS of paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide (Arm A) is superior to the nonplatinum doublet of paclitaxel plus topotecan (Arm B). [Table: see text].
منابع مشابه
A randomized phase II study of carboplatin with weekly or every-3-week nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (abraxane) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
BACKGROUND Platinum plus etoposide is the standard therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and is associated with significant myelosuppression. We hypothesized that the combination of carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) would be better tolerated. We investigated carboplatin with nab-paclitaxel on every-3-week and weekly schedules. METHOD...
متن کاملGemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar), paclitaxel (Taxol), and carboplatin (Paraplatin) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were included in this trial. A total of 69 patients from the phase II portion and 8 patients from the phase I portion were treated with gemcitabi...
متن کاملPaclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule oral etoposide for small-cell lung cancer.
We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of combination paclitaxel (Taxol) (via 1-hour infusion), carboplatin (Paraplatin), and oral etoposide (VePesid) in the first-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer. Between June 1993 and July 1996, 117 patients with small-cell lung cancer. were treated in two sequential phase II studies. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regime...
متن کاملComparing Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin with Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: a Single Institute Study
Aims: The backbone of treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. We intended to compare the effectiveness of two commonly used regimens in real world practice. Methods: This single institute, parallel comparative post marketing study included 100 patients with chemo-naïve advanced (stage IIIB, IV) non-small cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative O...
متن کاملPaclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Preclinically, the taxanes appear to potentiate radiation more effectively than do the platinum compounds. In our phase I trial (LUN-17) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, we defined the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of concomitant radiation and paclitaxel (Taxol). We then conducted a series of phase II clinical trials in patients with stage III A or stage III B...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The oncologist
دوره 10 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004